ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de (Ignatios Souvatzis) writes:
> Hm...
>
> the Post Office Protocol should be discussed in comp.PROTOCOLS.pop,
> not comp.LANG.pop... if comp.protocols.pop doesn't exist, try
> comp.protocols.internet or something similar.
Well it took a whole 5 days for the first one to come, which isn't
bad I suppose :-)
I guess I'm gonna have to put this in as the 0th item in the faq
(I've already got 4 others).
Here's the comp.lang.pop charter:
The group would serve for discussions on the programming language
Pop11, and related environments, libraries, languages and the Plug
User Group.
Relevant topics, in this group, would cover all aspects of Pop11
programming (from novice questions to expert efficiency issues) and
the current BSI standards effort (Pop9x), and how it relates to
other languages of this type (e.g. GLOW, Pepper).
Also relevant would be conversations about the Poplog programming
environment and its libraries. Eg.
OOP in Pop11 Flavours, or objectclass etc. and how they relate to
other OOP languages (C++, CLOS etc.)
X windows hacking in Pop11
Mixed language programming (eg. between Lisp/Pop11/Prolog/ML/C etc.)
that is supported in Poplog but isn't relevant for discussion in
other, pure language, groups
Techniques for Artificial Intelligence programming (it is an AI
language after all :)
and so on.
The group would be gatewayed, at Univ. of Sussex, onto the mailing
list for the industrial members with no internet access.
--
Ian Rogers - Research Fellow type person :)
School of Cognitive Science, Sussex University, Falmer, Brighton, UK
|