Date: | Mon Aug 30 16:16:31 1994 | |
Subject: | Re: Arrays with null bounds (again) | |
From: | James Anderson | |
Volume-ID: | 940901.01 |
In article <KERS.94Aug30085025@cdollin.hpl.hp.com>, kers@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Chris Dollin) writes: |> |> Why start by supposing an evident falsehood? Why would any array with |> ``no'' bounds (correctly, with the empty tuple of bounds) be analogous |> to a 0x0 matrix? Granted. Why would an empty tuple of bounds describe an object containing an element? Erk. I have just seen the light - again. James |