Date: | Mon Nov 12 16:34:10 1992 | |
Subject: | Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic? | |
From: | Wayne Smith | |
Volume-ID: | 921113.04 |
Flame me all you want, but if some obscure UK language developed 20 years ago can make it into a comp.lang group, why is basic still shit-upon and relegated to the status of an alt group? (alt.lang.basic)? |