[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] Date Index Thread Index Search archive:
Date:Mon Nov 12 16:34:10 1992 
Subject:Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic? 
From:Wayne Smith 
Volume-ID:921113.04 

Flame me all you want, but if some obscure UK language developed 20
years ago can make it into a comp.lang group, why is basic still shit-upon 
and relegated to the status of an alt group? (alt.lang.basic)?