[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] Date Index Thread Index Search archive:
Date:Mon Aug 30 16:50:25 1994 
Subject:Re: Arrays with null bounds (again) 
From:Chris Dollin 
Volume-ID:940831.01 

anderson@kogs11.informatik.uni-hamburg.de (James Anderson) writes:

   Suppose that a pop array with no bounds is analogous to a
   0 x 0 matrix (whatever that might be). Then a 0 x 0 matrix
   contains an element.

I'm sure Steve will whizz by on this one anyway ...

Why start by supposing an evident falsehood? Why would any array with
``no'' bounds (correctly, with the empty tuple of bounds) be analogous
to a 0x0 matrix? 
--

Regards, Kers.
"If anything anyone lacks, they'll find it all ready in stacks."