[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] Date Index Thread Index Search archive:
Date:Mon Sep 28 19:57:00 1993 
Subject:Re: Threaded Interpretive Languages 
From:Julian V. Noble 
Volume-ID:930929.01 

pop@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk  writes:
> 

	[ lots of stuff about POP-1, POP-2, ... POP-11 and FORTH deleted ]
> 
> The only snag here is that assembler is non-portable. The C-interface of
> POPLOG is to my mind preferable.
> 
> 
> Robin Popplestone.

Thank you for your spirited discussion of another little-known language.

It is obvious that you like it. Possibly the name appeals to you?  :-)

I note Chuck Moore did not name his creation "MOORTH" however...

--jvn