[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] Date Index Thread Index Search archive:
Date:Mon Jan 9 01:39:23 1993 
Subject:Re: lvars and standards (was: Re: List and Vector Syntax) 
From:Ray Dunn 
Volume-ID:930110.01 

In refd article, kers@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Chris Dollin) writes:
>In article ... ianr@syma.sussex.ac.uk (Ian Rogers) writes:
>
>   There will be no MSDOS or Mac version of Pop11 without an
>   identifiable, sufficient subset of Pop11 commands and syntax. This
>   is why Pepper and GLOW have occurred!
>
>I can't speak for GLOW, but that *isn't* why I designed and (proto) implemented
>Pepper. 

Nor do I see any reason why it should be so.  Anybody?

Having been hacking in 'C' for the last ..cough.. years I can't understand
why there wasn't a 'C' implementation of POP done a long time ago.

I hope the work on Pepper is being done in a portable fashion.
-- 
Ray Dunn at home        |  Beaconsfield, Quebec  |  Phone: (514) 630 3749
ray@philmtl.philips.ca  |  ray@cam.org           |  uunet!sobeco!philmtl!ray