In article <1992Nov12.163410.12678@julian.uwo.ca> wlsmith@valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca (Wayne Smith) writes:
>Flame me all you want, but if some obscure UK language developed 20
>years ago can make it into a comp.lang group, why is basic still shit-upon
>and relegated to the status of an alt group? (alt.lang.basic)?
Sounds to me as though BASIC's getting a little more respect than
it deserves. Perhaps there's something at least marginally
interesting about pop. You can't honestly say that about BASIC,
now, can you?
|