[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] Date Index Thread Index Search archive:
Date:Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:15:47 +0000 (UTC) 
Subject:Re: Status of OpenPoplog (fwd) 
From:A . Sloman 
Volume-ID: 

Brent

> Jeff -- this update should be propogated into the
> Sourceforge project, shouldn't it?

I think that at the time I still regarded it as experimental
and planned to wait till several people had had a chance to
check that it caused no problems before announcing it as
a final change.

Then I forgot!

I think it's clear now that the changes are OK as quite a lot of people
have installed poplog since then, and this has caused no problems.

> > I have just realized that I forgot to record all
> > this in
> >
> > http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/poplog/bugfixes/
> >
> > which I'll try to do soon.
> >
>
> Speaking of which -- I remember seeing a post
> somewhere about the proper sequence for attempting to
> build a new version of Poplog from scratch.  I can't
> seem to locate the link now -- does anyone know where
> I can find this information?

There's some documentation in
    http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/poplog/sysdoc/

Also bundled here
    http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/poplog/sysdoc.tar.gz
        75818 bytes Sep  8  2002

Incidentally, thanks for the plug for poplog here, reported earlier
by Adrian:

    http://lambda.weblogs.com/discuss/msgReader$11880

Aaron