Lee Goddard <L.Goddard@sussex.ac.uk> writes:
> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:58:47 +0100
>
> Sorry to use Win32. I am, really, and I'm trying to get (Corel)
> Linux running on my box, but no joy yet.
Any particular reason for using Corel? I read in a review somewhere
that it was harder than others to install. Most people here use
Redhat. Some use Suse. I believe linux poplog works with both,
though I've never heard of anyone using it with corel. That doesn't
mean it won't. I know of one person who has used it with Debian.
> In the meantime, how
> can I get POPLOG PROLOG to consult a file and run a program on
> those clauses, please?
It should use the same syntax as any other version of prolog.
e.g.
?- ['myfile.pl'].
> I've got the helpfiles, so I can call POPROOT/pop/pop/winpop11.exe
> +prolog, no problems. But on +music, I'm told: that the saved
> image is not found, involving 'music.psv'. The PSV is there,
> alongside prolog.psv.
>
> Is that likely to be a problem with the saved image? Or is it
> maybe in the wrong place?
You should be able to do the same thing, but it depends how you
created the saved image. If it uses prolog, then you may
have to run
winpop11.exe +prolog.psv +music.psv
But I have no idea if that works on windows.
On newer versions of Unix poplog (since August 1996) you
don't need to include the intermediate saved images, as long as
all the intermediate images have not been moved since the last saved
image was created. I don't know whether that feature is in the
current windows poplog.
There should be some knowledgeable people at Sussex who can help
you. But they may be too busy to read news and pop-forum.
Aaron
|