comp.lang.pop
for 1992 by:
Date
/
Thread
- page 1 of 1
Search archive:
Gateway'd yet?
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 11 18:16:31 1992
-->
help
-
msanghvi@cs.ulowell.edu
Mon Nov 12 03:55:49 1992
-->
Re: Gateway'd yet?
-
aqw@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 12 13:14:37 1992
-->
What's pop?
-
wlsmith@valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca
Mon Nov 12 14:04:03 1992
-->
What's pop?
-
sammy@smds.com
Mon Nov 12 14:30:19 1992
-->
Re: help
-
mal@hobbes.genrad.com
Mon Nov 12 14:46:01 1992
-->
Re: help
-
bh@anarres.CS.Berkeley.EDU
Mon Nov 12 16:08:48 1992
-->
Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
wlsmith@valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca
Mon Nov 12 16:34:10 1992
-->
Re: help
-
nikhil@crl.dec.com
Mon Nov 12 17:51:38 1992
-->
Why is POP here? (was Re: help)
-
mjl@bos.locus.com
Mon Nov 12 18:33:19 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
tlhouse@nyx.cs.du.edu
Mon Nov 13 00:34:14 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
jmartens@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
Mon Nov 13 01:21:08 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
uesu03@giac1.oscs.montana.edu
Mon Nov 13 02:21:17 1992
-->
Re: help
-
bh@anarres.CS.Berkeley.EDU
Mon Nov 13 05:27:17 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
etxmesa@eos.ericsson.se
Mon Nov 13 08:45:58 1992
-->
Re: Why is POP here? (was Re: help)
-
kers@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 13 10:17:16 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 13 11:22:56 1992
-->
Re: What's pop?
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 13 11:23:53 1992
-->
Re: Re: help
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 13 11:31:03 1992
-->
Poplog for the SPARCclassic(TM) running Solaris 2.x
-
lpb@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 13 11:37:02 1992
-->
Re: What's pop?
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 13 11:40:21 1992
-->
Re: What's pop? (Post Office Protocol???)
-
orloff@surya4.cern.ch
Mon Nov 13 12:15:09 1992
-->
Re: Why is POP here? (was Re: help)
-
plummer@cs.swarthmore.edu
Mon Nov 13 12:49:19 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
David.Beasley@cm.cf.ac.uk
Mon Nov 13 12:56:55 1992
-->
Re: Why is POP here? (was Re: help)
-
kers@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 13 13:45:48 1992
-->
PD Pop for the Mac?
-
jack@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk
Mon Nov 13 14:23:04 1992
-->
POP good for AI?
-
Whitten@Fwva.Saic.Com
Mon Nov 13 16:46:03 1992
-->
Re: Re: help
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 13 17:32:04 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
fredf@microsoft.com
Mon Nov 13 18:05:23 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 13 22:49:35 1992
-->
Re: PD Pop for the Mac?
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 13 23:09:58 1992
-->
Re: Poplog for the SPARCclassic(TM) running Solaris 2.x
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 13 23:39:54 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
bruceg@access.digex.com
Mon Nov 14 00:06:51 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
zeta%tcscs@idss.nwa.com
Mon Nov 14 00:34:25 1992
-->
Re: Re: help [more on features of Pop-11]
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 14 11:57:08 1992
-->
Re: Re: help [Real time and Pop-11]
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 14 12:50:57 1992
-->
pop system publicly available for unix?
-
jearls@phoenix.csc.calpoly.edu
Mon Nov 14 15:38:01 1992
-->
A little Pop history
-
jcl@deshaw.com
Mon Nov 14 15:55:04 1992
-->
Re: Re: help
-
stramba@zooid.guild.org
Mon Nov 14 16:48:06 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 14 17:03:47 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
bh@anarres.CS.Berkeley.EDU
Mon Nov 14 17:09:55 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
lpb@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 14 22:37:57 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 14 23:20:34 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
jcl@deshaw.com
Mon Nov 15 15:52:54 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
bh@anarres.CS.Berkeley.EDU
Mon Nov 15 21:20:26 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 16 01:50:01 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
jskaggs@slate.mines.colorado.edu
Mon Nov 16 02:33:50 1992
-->
Re: PD Pop for the Mac?
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 16 12:11:45 1992
-->
FTP'able pop for msdos
-
diarmuid@uniwa.uwa.edu.au
Mon Nov 16 13:15:30 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
lpb@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 16 16:23:54 1992
-->
Re: FTP'able pop for msdos
-
kers@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 17 07:56:11 1992
-->
PD Pop
-
mulcihy@sweetpea.jsc.nasa.gov
Mon Nov 17 13:26:26 1992
-->
X and Pop
-
kr1@csug.cs.reading.ac.uk
Mon Nov 17 14:33:47 1992
-->
Yet another anoying feature of VED
-
tmr@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 17 15:01:29 1992
-->
An example
-
kers@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 17 17:01:16 1992
-->
Re: FTP'able pop for msdos
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 17 17:08:09 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 17 17:52:42 1992
-->
Re: FTP'able pop for msdos
-
bh@anarres.CS.Berkeley.EDU
Mon Nov 17 21:45:30 1992
-->
Re: Yet another anoying feature of VED
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 17 22:49:12 1992
-->
Re: PD Pop
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 17 22:59:25 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
jbm@hal.trl.OZ.AU
Mon Nov 18 02:42:54 1992
-->
Re: FTP'able pop for msdos
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 18 11:27:24 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 18 12:29:21 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
mst@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
Mon Nov 18 13:43:27 1992
-->
Re: FTP'able pop for msdos
-
kers@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 18 14:11:34 1992
-->
Re: help
-
a324kuzm@cdf.toronto.edu
Mon Nov 18 18:02:37 1992
-->
Re: PD Pop
-
anderson@sapir.cog.jhu.edu
Mon Nov 18 20:28:45 1992
-->
Re: What's pop? (Post Office Protocol???)
-
ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de
Mon Nov 19 12:03:29 1992
-->
Re: What's pop? (Post Office Protocol???)
-
ianr@syma.sussex.ac.uk
Mon Nov 19 17:28:29 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 19 17:55:32 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 19 18:42:11 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 19 18:47:39 1992
-->
Re: Re: Re: help [Real time and Pop-11]
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 19 19:02:54 1992
-->
Re: Yet another anoying feature of VED
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 19 19:09:42 1992
-->
Re: What's pop? (Post Office Protocol???)
-
yatesbd@pharm.med.upenn.edu
Mon Nov 20 01:50:39 1992
-->
Re: PD Pop for the Mac?
-
cjp@aber.ac.uk
Mon Nov 20 08:48:00 1992
-->
Re: PD Pop for the Mac?
-
cgra@btma74.nohost.nodomain
Mon Nov 20 10:40:36 1992
-->
Re: Ok, so pop *pop* may be a valid lang, but where's basic?
-
pitchers@prlhp1.prl.philips.co.uk
Mon Nov 20 11:14:52 1992
-->
Re: Re: What's pop? (Post Office Protocol???)
-
kers@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 20 13:52:41 1992
-->
(Post Office Protocol?)
-
jcl@deshaw.com
Mon Nov 20 17:56:15 1992
-->
Re: FTP'able pop for msdos
-
diarmuid@uniwa.uwa.edu.au
Mon Nov 21 12:20:13 1992
-->
Clarity VS Efficiency in POP11
-
tmr@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 21 12:27:34 1992
-->
Reference Card
-
tmr@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 21 15:36:27 1992
-->
Re: Clarity VS Efficiency in POP11
-
ianr@syma.sussex.ac.uk
Mon Nov 22 13:14:43 1992
-->
User stack overflow: Detecting the culprit
-
lpb@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 22 14:41:57 1992
-->
Re: User stack overflow: Detecting the culprit
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 22 16:20:06 1992
-->
A tip: using exitto while debugging
-
lpb@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 22 17:53:34 1992
-->
PLUG Source Code Archive (R4)
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 22 21:54:23 1992
-->
Re: FTP'able pop for msdos
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 22 21:57:47 1992
-->
Re: Clarity VS Efficiency in POP11
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 22 22:50:05 1992
-->
Re: Reference Card
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 22 22:52:38 1992
-->
Re: Clarity VS Efficiency in POP11
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 22 23:27:52 1992
-->
Re: FTP'able pop for MSDOS - GLOW
-
exs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 23 12:06:13 1992
-->
Free-listing closures
-
ianr@syma.sussex.ac.uk
Mon Nov 23 12:44:51 1992
-->
Re: Clarity VS Efficiency in POP11
-
tmr@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 24 10:52:51 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
ray@philmtl.philips.ca
Mon Nov 26 05:45:54 1992
-->
AlphaPop
-
rudil@syma.sussex.ac.uk
Mon Nov 26 13:52:11 1992
-->
Is there a 3-D extension to LIB RC_GRAPHPLOT
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 26 14:58:15 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
jack@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk
Mon Nov 26 15:08:26 1992
-->
Paranoid Pop Pieces #1
-
kers@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 26 15:42:07 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history (POP-10)
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 26 23:24:46 1992
-->
Accessing rc_start (from RC_GRAPHIC) within a section
-
lpb@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 26 23:26:04 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 26 23:48:28 1992
-->
Re: Accessing rc_start (from RC_GRAPHIC) within a section
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 27 00:00:21 1992
-->
persistence (was Re: A little Pop history)
-
ianr@syma.sussex.ac.uk
Mon Nov 27 12:19:03 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
lasner@watsun.cc.columbia.edu
Mon Nov 27 14:56:03 1992
-->
Theorem Prover/Reason maintenance System
-
rudil@syma.sussex.ac.uk
Mon Nov 27 15:34:34 1992
-->
Re: User stack overflow: Detecting the culprit
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 27 16:51:18 1992
-->
Re: Theorem Prover/Reason maintenance System
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Nov 27 23:21:59 1992
-->
Re: Accessing rc_start (from RC_GRAPHIC) within a section
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Nov 28 16:58:15 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
alderson@elaine46.Stanford.EDU
Mon Dec 1 00:36:02 1992
-->
Architectures
-
pop@cs.umass.edu
Mon Dec 1 13:50:43 1992
-->
persistence
-
pop@cs.umass.edu
Mon Dec 1 14:26:24 1992
-->
The Open Stack
-
pop@cs.umass.edu
Mon Dec 1 14:54:49 1992
-->
Announcing a competition
-
popx@vax.oxford.ac.uk
Mon Dec 1 16:16:20 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
ray@philmtl.philips.ca
Mon Dec 2 01:07:17 1992
-->
Re: The Open Stack
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 2 08:57:33 1992
-->
Re: persistence (was Re: A little Pop history)
-
sjmz@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 2 14:52:18 1992
-->
Re: Hello
-
jadwa@isg.reading.ac.uk
Mon Dec 2 15:27:15 1992
-->
Re: persistence
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 3 20:44:33 1992
-->
Re: Re: Hello
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 3 20:48:54 1992
-->
Re: The Open Stack
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 3 20:55:46 1992
-->
bitmaps/patterns in rc_graphic
-
exs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 4 12:29:02 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
cgra@btma74.nohost.nodomain
Mon Dec 4 16:43:17 1992
-->
Re: bitmaps/patterns in rc_graphic
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 5 01:06:08 1992
-->
POP11 Humour!
-
tmr@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 5 15:54:09 1992
-->
Modes for ved
-
tmr@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 5 16:09:22 1992
-->
Does PRINTF *really* call SYS_SYSPR?
-
lpb@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 5 16:55:46 1992
-->
Re: Modes for ved
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 5 17:25:02 1992
-->
Does PRINTF *really* call SYS_SYSPR?
-
lpb@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 5 20:57:07 1992
-->
Re: A little Pop history
-
ray@philmtl.philips.ca
Mon Dec 6 05:35:27 1992
-->
Re: Does PRINTF *really* call SYS_SYSPR?
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 6 14:16:16 1992
-->
Re: POP11 Humour!
-
billk@hawk.cs.ukans.edu
Mon Dec 6 14:22:00 1992
-->
Re: Modes for ved
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 6 19:32:23 1992
-->
Re: Modes for ved
-
andyh@syma.sussex.ac.uk
Mon Dec 7 12:16:04 1992
-->
Re: Modes for ved
-
tmr@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 7 15:42:39 1992
-->
Re: POP11 Humour!
-
jcl@deshaw.com
Mon Dec 8 00:42:51 1992
-->
Syntax Misdesign
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 11 12:00:57 1992
-->
Editors
-
pop@cs.umass.edu
Mon Dec 11 21:03:47 1992
-->
rc_graphic
-
tmr@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 12 12:37:52 1992
-->
Re: rc_graphic
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 13 13:37:10 1992
-->
Re: Editors
-
tmr@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 14 15:58:21 1992
-->
Re: Syntax Misdesign
-
johnw@syma.sussex.ac.uk
Mon Dec 14 18:14:45 1992
-->
Re: Editors
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 15 13:40:58 1992
-->
POP syntax
-
pop@cs.umass.edu
Mon Dec 15 14:00:38 1992
-->
Associativity and stacks
-
pop@cs.umass.edu
Mon Dec 15 14:14:48 1992
-->
memoise
-
ianr@syma.sussex.ac.uk
Mon Dec 15 15:54:27 1992
-->
Re: Syntax Misdesign
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 15 23:13:58 1992
-->
Re: Editors
-
andyh@syma.sussex.ac.uk
Mon Dec 16 10:52:27 1992
-->
Re: Syntax Misdesign
-
kers@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 16 16:27:24 1992
-->
List and Vector Syntax (long)
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 16 17:11:54 1992
-->
Re: Editors
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 16 22:31:00 1992
-->
Re: List and Vector Syntax (long)
-
bh@anarres.CS.Berkeley.EDU
Mon Dec 16 23:28:32 1992
-->
Re: Editors
-
tmr@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 17 11:30:38 1992
-->
Re: POP syntax
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 20 15:00:33 1992
-->
Re: POP syntax
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 22 14:13:51 1992
-->
Dynamic List Implementation
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 22 14:55:12 1992
-->
4th tag code
-
sfk@otter.hpl.hp.com
Mon Dec 22 15:04:19 1992
-->
Re: Syntax Misdesign
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 22 16:41:40 1992
-->
Re: List and Vector Syntax (long)
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 22 17:03:41 1992
-->
Re: List and Vector Syntax (long)
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 22 17:22:12 1992
-->
Re: POP syntax
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 22 17:47:43 1992
-->
Re: Dynamic List Implementation
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 23 09:06:15 1992
-->
When the (Gibson) cat's away across the atlantic....
-
pop@cs.umass.edu
Mon Dec 23 14:10:39 1992
-->
Re: Dynamic List Implementation
-
axs@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 23 16:49:05 1992
-->
Dynamic lists
-
pop@cs.umass.edu
Mon Dec 23 18:46:18 1992
-->
The Joys of X !!
-
tmr@cs.bham.ac.uk
Mon Dec 28 14:44:20 1992
-->
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.6.8
comp.lang.pop
for 1992 by:
Date
/
Thread
- page 1 of 1