[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] Date Index Thread Index Search archive:
Date:Mon Jun 9 13:26:20 1993 
Subject:Re: Suppressing ;;;LIB messages 
From:Daniel Cunliffe 
Volume-ID:930609.06 

In article <C8Covp.Kxy@cs.bham.ac.uk> ianr@uk.ac.sussex.cogs (ianr (Ian Rogers)) writes:
>There's two answers here: one to the question you asked, and one to the
>question you *should* have asked ;-)
>
>1.  well in my system it's -libwarning- so:
>
>    erase -> libwarning;
>
>could do the trick.

Nope :-(

>2. Why are you using lib? In most cases you can substitute uses. Ie.:
>
>    uses libwarning
>
>instead of
>
>    lib libwarning
>
>The advantage to -uses- is that it checks (in a fairly mindless way
>admittedly) to see if the library has already been loaded, and if it has
>it doesn't try to load it again. In any case it works silently.
>
>lib forces a reload every time (which may be useful - but rarely is).

Nope - see previous posting. Aaron suggests I look into the library file
itself, more news as it happens (I blame Tom - he wrote it :-)

Daniel.

>Ian Rogers - Research Fellow type person :)
-who used to have a microphone haircut as an undergrad :-)