In article <1992Nov12.163410.12678@julian.uwo.ca>, wlsmith@valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca (Wayne Smith) writes:
|> Flame me all you want, but if some obscure UK language developed 20
|> years ago can make it into a comp.lang group, why is basic still shit-upon
|> and relegated to the status of an alt group? (alt.lang.basic)?
|>
Actually shitting on basic is IMHO redundant :^)
--
Michael Salmon
#include <standard.disclaimer>
#include <witty.saying>
#include <fancy.pseudo.graphics>
Ericsson Telecom AB
Stockholm
|