In article <C9Cxpn.7n7@cs.bham.ac.uk> A.Sloman@cs.bham.ac.uk (Aaron Sloman) writes:
>And you don't need an OOP language to give you support for
>abstraction. It's a requirement for *any* well structured language
>providing user-defined datatypes. (E.g. ML ?)
THANKS, Aaron!
I finally saw the light after my last message. <grin> You are right!
And I understand why you are right. And I agree with you...now that I
understand.
Thanks, again, for your willingness to explain this to me in detail.
...David
================================================================================
David LaGrone | All comments, opinions and inquiries are my own.
Texas Instruments | They are NOT to be attributed to Texas Instru-
P. O. Box 650311 M/S 3928 | ments, Inc., or any other employees or agents.
Dallas, Texas 75065-0311 |
(214) 917-1908 fax 917-7519 | Does this satisfactorily exclude everyone but me?
----------------------------+
lagrone@flopn2.dseg.ti.com |
================================================================================
|