Craig Brozefsky (craig@red-bean.com) wrote:
: jtotland@online.no (Jo Totland) writes:
: > Sounds fun! Firsthand, I'm primarily interested in the
: > non-pop-11-parts of poplog, and mainly its implementation of CL. How
: > good is it?
: It's fairly complete from my own experience. I have only really run
: across a limitation in defclass which does not support the :type
: specifier in slot descriptions. I have not really excercised it all
: that much, particularly not loop macros.
Actually, there are a lot of areas which should be improved for conformance.
Luckily, with the sources, we can do something about this.
The LOOP macro used is the one from MIT which almost all lisp
implementations use (only Clisp doesn't use it by default, AFAIK).
No problems for LOOP.
P.
|