jtotland@online.no (Jo Totland) writes:
> Sounds fun! Firsthand, I'm primarily interested in the
> non-pop-11-parts of poplog, and mainly its implementation of CL. How
> good is it?
It's fairly complete from my own experience. I have only really run
across a limitation in defclass which does not support the :type
specifier in slot descriptions. I have not really excercised it all
that much, particularly not loop macros.
> I guess most people here would prefer to use pop-11, but for a
> newcomer I would feel more at home if the system was fully usable from
> common lisp. Is the integration for real?
It is very complete integration, and you can call pop-11 from lisp.
--
Craig Brozefsky <craig@red-bean.com>
Free Scheme/Lisp Software http://www.red-bean.com/~craig
I say woe unto those who are wise in their own eyes, and yet
imprudent in 'dem outside -Sizzla
|