Brent
> Jeff -- this update should be propogated into the
> Sourceforge project, shouldn't it?
I think that at the time I still regarded it as experimental
and planned to wait till several people had had a chance to
check that it caused no problems before announcing it as
a final change.
Then I forgot!
I think it's clear now that the changes are OK as quite a lot of people
have installed poplog since then, and this has caused no problems.
> > I have just realized that I forgot to record all
> > this in
> >
> > http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/poplog/bugfixes/
> >
> > which I'll try to do soon.
> >
>
> Speaking of which -- I remember seeing a post
> somewhere about the proper sequence for attempting to
> build a new version of Poplog from scratch. I can't
> seem to locate the link now -- does anyone know where
> I can find this information?
There's some documentation in
http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/poplog/sysdoc/
Also bundled here
http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/poplog/sysdoc.tar.gz
75818 bytes Sep 8 2002
Incidentally, thanks for the plug for poplog here, reported earlier
by Adrian:
http://lambda.weblogs.com/discuss/msgReader$11880
Aaron
|